Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VEEAM Exam VMCE_v12 Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for VEEAM's VMCE_v12 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 1
[All VMCE_v12 Questions]

A customer has a physical windows server running Microsoft SQL 2020.

Which component should be used to protect the whole server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

It is recommended to install Veeam ONE before Veeam Backup & Replication because Veeam ONE can potentially identify infrastructure issues that might affect backup operations before they are performed. This proactive approach ensures that the environment is optimized for successful backup and replication tasks. Reference: Veeam Installation and Configuration Guide, Veeam ONE Deployment Best Practices


by Arminda at Mar 09, 2024, 12:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium VMCE_v12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jutta
1 months ago
Veeam Agent all the way! It's like the Swiss Army Knife of server protection - does the whole shebang. Just don't forget to bring your duct tape and baling wire, just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 months ago
Cache Repository? That sounds more like a storage solution, not a protection method. I think I'll skip that one and look at the other options more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 months ago
The Veeam Backup Proxy looks promising, but I'm not sure if it can handle the full server backup. Gotta make sure it's not just for SQL databases.
upvoted 0 times
Nina
2 days ago
A: So, Veeam Backup Proxy would be the best choice for protecting the physical Windows server running Microsoft SQL 2020.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
18 days ago
B: Yeah, I agree. It's designed to protect the whole server, including SQL databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
23 days ago
A: I think Veeam Backup Proxy can handle full server backups, not just SQL databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
The Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application is designed specifically for SQL, but it won't protect the rest of the server. This is a whole server protection question, so that's not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Laquanda
16 days ago
C: Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application is more focused on SQL, so it might not be the best choice for whole server protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
16 days ago
D) Cache Repository
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
28 days ago
B: I agree, Veeam Agent is designed for full server protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
29 days ago
C) Veeam Backup Proxy
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
1 months ago
A: I think the best option would be Veeam Agent to protect the whole server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
1 months ago
A) Veeam Agent
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
2 months ago
Hmm, Veeam Agent seems like the logical choice here to protect the entire server, not just the SQL database. I wonder if it can handle the server's other workloads too.
upvoted 0 times
Precious
2 days ago
Veeam Agent is designed to protect the entire server, so it should work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
3 days ago
C) Veeam Backup Proxy
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 days ago
I agree, Veeam Agent should be able to handle all the server's workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
7 days ago
B) Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
28 days ago
I think Veeam Agent is the best choice for protecting the whole server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 months ago
A) Veeam Agent
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thea
2 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I see your rationale. I might reconsider my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Veeam Backup Proxy because it can efficiently protect the server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Veeam Agent because it can protect the whole server.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77