Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Veritas Exam VCS-278 Topic 1 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Veritas's VCS-278 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 1
[All VCS-278 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Two media servers, sharing a library with 6 tape drives, exist in the NetBackup environment displayed in the exhibit. Both weekly Full and daily Differential Incremental backups need to run for the clients and each schedule has a different retention period. Because of network topology, some clients back up to Media server 1 and some back up to Media server 2. The environment suffers from multiple status 96 failures during the backup window.

How can the administrator minimize the number of failures?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Wilson
4 months ago
You know, this whole situation sounds like a classic case of 'too many cooks in the kitchen.' I'd go with D and let the media sharing work its magic.
upvoted 0 times
Wilson
2 months ago
Maybe enabling backups to span tape media could distribute the workload better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
2 months ago
True, increasing the 'Media unmount delay' might give the system more time to handle the backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
2 months ago
I think configuring media multiplexing could also help optimize the backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
Agreed, enabling media sharing would definitely help streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the administrator is feeling like a real-life Tape Whisperer trying to wrangle all these backups. Option B seems like a pretty slick solution, though.
upvoted 0 times
Anjelica
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It could definitely streamline the backup process and reduce the number of failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
3 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. Media multiplexing could help with the status 96 failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dexter
4 months ago
Nah, I don't think option C is the right solution here. Enabling backups to span tape media might just create more complexity and problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree with A. Increasing the media unmount delay could give the backups more time to complete without running into issues.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree with A. Increasing the media unmount delay could give the backups more time to complete without running into issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
4 months ago
B) configure media multiplexing
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
4 months ago
A) increase the ''Media unmount delay''
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
5 months ago
Media sharing could work too, but I still think multiplexing is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) enable media sharing could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
5 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. Enabling media sharing should help distribute the load across the tape drives and reduce those pesky status 96 failures.
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
4 months ago
I think configuring media multiplexing could also help in reducing the failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
I agree, enabling media sharing would definitely help balance the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
4 months ago
Let's give it a try and see if enabling media sharing improves the backup process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
4 months ago
I agree, enabling media sharing might be the key to reducing those status 96 failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
4 months ago
Option D sounds like a good solution. Sharing the media could definitely help balance the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marcelle
5 months ago
I agree with Paris, media multiplexing can help minimize failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I think the answer is B) configure media multiplexing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77