Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 1V0-21.20 Topic 4 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 1V0-21.20 exam

Question #: 77
Topic #: 4

[All 1V0-21.20 Questions]

An administrator would like to enable a switch setting to restrict the network bandwidth that is available to ports, but the solution must also allow bursts of traffic to flow through at higher speeds. Which vSphere Distributed Switch setting accomplishes this goal?

AMonitoring

BSecurity

CTraffic shaping

DTeaming and failover

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Elin at Jun 29, 2024, 06:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1V0-21.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dorothy

5 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) Teaming and failover could also be a possibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devorah

5 months ago

I agree with Elliott, because traffic shaping can control bandwidth and allow bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

5 months ago

Hmm, C) Traffic shaping seems to be the winner here. I can already picture the administrator setting that up with a smile on their face.

upvoted 0 times

Crista

4 months ago

Yes, it allows for controlling the bandwidth while still allowing bursts of traffic. Smart choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Farrah

5 months ago

I agree, C) Traffic shaping is the way to go for that scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Elliott

5 months ago

I think the answer is C) Traffic shaping.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

5 months ago

Definitely C) Traffic shaping. It's the only option that mentions 'restricting bandwidth' and 'allowing bursts of traffic'.

upvoted 0 times

Isaiah

4 months ago

Security and Teaming and failover are not related to bandwidth restrictions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

4 months ago

Monitoring wouldn't accomplish both goals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

4 months ago

Yes, I agree. It allows for restricting bandwidth but also allows bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

5 months ago

I think it's C) Traffic shaping.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Ilona

6 months ago

I'd go with C) Traffic shaping. Sounds like the perfect solution to control bandwidth while allowing bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

Scarlet

5 months ago

I think C) Traffic shaping is the way to go too. It allows for control over bandwidth while still allowing bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emeline

5 months ago

I agree, C) Traffic shaping seems like the best option for that scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77