Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 1V0-21.20 Topic 5 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 1V0-21.20 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 5
[All 1V0-21.20 Questions]

An administrator would like to enable a switch setting to restrict the network bandwidth that is available to ports, but the solution must also allow bursts of traffic to flow through at higher speeds. Which vSphere Distributed Switch setting accomplishes this goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Owen
16 days ago
You know, when it comes to network settings, I always go for the option that sounds the most 'shaping'. So C) Traffic shaping gets my vote. Gotta keep that bandwidth in tip-top shape, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
21 days ago
Alright, time to put on my network admin hat. I reckon C) Traffic shaping is the answer here. Keeps the bandwidth in check and lets the party traffic flow. Perfect balance, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
20 hours ago
User 2: Agreed, it's important to manage bandwidth while still allowing for bursts of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
13 days ago
User 1: I think you're right, C) Traffic shaping sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larue
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Teaming and failover could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
1 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. But I think C) Traffic shaping is the way to go. Gotta love that burst of speed, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Dorathy
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it allows bursts of traffic at higher speeds while still restricting overall bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
15 days ago
User 1: I agree, C) Traffic shaping is the best option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassie
1 months ago
I agree with Audry, because traffic shaping can control bandwidth and allow bursts of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
1 months ago
I'm going with C) Traffic shaping. It sounds like the perfect solution to control bandwidth while allowing bursts of higher speed traffic. Can't go wrong with that!
upvoted 0 times
Wilburn
24 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it's important to have control over bandwidth while still allowing bursts of traffic to flow through at higher speeds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
29 days ago
User 1: I agree, C) Traffic shaping seems like the best option for that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
1 months ago
I think the answer is C) Traffic shaping.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77