Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware Exam 2V0-33.22 Topic 13 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-33.22 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 13
[All 2V0-33.22 Questions]

On VMware Cloud on AWS, which type of host do you use when you require high local storage requirements and additional cores for your workloads? (Select one option)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The i3en.metal host type is a storage-optimized host type that is best suited for workloads that require high capacity, high performance storage. It has 48 physical cores, 768 GB of RAM, and 45.84 TiB of storage. It also has a network performance of 100 Gbps, which is higher than the other host types. The i3en.metal host type can support more VMs and more data-intensive applications than the other host types.Reference:VMware Cloud on AWS Host Types,VMware Cloud on AWS Pricing


by Junita at Jul 17, 2024, 02:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-33.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shaniqua
4 months ago
Hmm, this is a real brain-teaser. I'm going to go with my gut and choose C) i3.metal. Sounds like it has the muscle to handle those high-performance workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
4 months ago
This is a tough one, but I'm going with A) ve-standard-72. The 've' must stand for 'virtual environment', so that's gotta be the right option.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
3 months ago
I agree with you, A) ve-standard-72 seems like a good choice for high local storage and cores.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but D) AV36 might be the best option for additional cores.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) i3en.metal. It seems like it would have the high local storage I need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
3 months ago
I think I'll go with C) i3.metal. It sounds like it would meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chantay
4 months ago
D) AV36 is clearly the answer. I mean, who wouldn't want a host with 'AV' in the name? It's probably got some built-in antivirus or something.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
3 months ago
I agree, i3.metal seems like a solid choice for additional cores and storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
I think I would go with i3.metal for high local storage requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
4 months ago
B) i3en.metal seems like the best choice here. The 'en' probably stands for 'enhanced', so that must be the one with the extra performance.
upvoted 0 times
Jannette
4 months ago
Let's go with i3en.metal for our workloads then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
4 months ago
I agree, the 'en' probably does stand for 'enhanced' performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
I think i3en.metal is the best option for high local storage and additional cores.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenia
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think ve-standard-72 could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's C) i3.metal. That sounds like the option with the high local storage and additional cores.
upvoted 0 times
Dwight
4 months ago
Yes, C) i3.metal is the host type that offers high local storage and additional cores for workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
4 months ago
I agree, C) i3.metal is the most suitable choice for those requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
4 months ago
I think you're right, C) i3.metal does seem like the best option for high local storage and additional cores.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
5 months ago
I agree with Gerald, i3.metal makes sense for high local storage requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
5 months ago
I think the answer is C) i3.metal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77