Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 3V0-32.21 Topic 9 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 3V0-32.21 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 9
[All 3V0-32.21 Questions]

An organization's cloud team would like to reduce template sprawl. Below are the applications they want to deploy using cloud templates:

MS SQL and Web IIS applications on OS types Windows 2016 and Windows 2019

Oracle WebLogic and Oracle DB applications on OS types RHEL7 and RHEL 8

Which two options would meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lillian
7 months ago
I see your point, But what about option A, creating image mappings for the OS types? Wouldn't that reduce clutter as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
7 months ago
But wouldn't that lead to a lot of templates? Option C might be a good compromise, upgrading existing templates with user input for OS selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better. Creating a Cloud Template for each OS type and letting the user pick the application type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
7 months ago
I think option B makes sense, creating a Cloud Template for each application type with a combination of OS types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
8 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine someone trying to create a template for each OS type and then having the user select the application type. That would be a complete mess!
upvoted 0 times
Slyvia
7 months ago
C) Create a Cloud Template or upgrade an existing one with user input to select the OS type
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
7 months ago
B) Create a Cloud Template for each application type with a combination of OS types
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisha
8 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. Creating a separate template for each application type with a combination of OS types seems like it could still lead to a lot of templates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Creating a single cloud template with user input to select the OS type seems like the most flexible and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
8 months ago
Yeah, that's a good point. I think options B and C are the most promising here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
8 months ago
I agree. We definitely don't want to create a separate template for each application and OS type, that would just lead to more sprawl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
8 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The key here is to reduce template sprawl, which means we need to find a way to consolidate the different application and OS combinations into as few templates as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77