Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 5V0-21.21 Topic 3 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 3
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

An administrator would like to upgrade ten identically configured 2-node vSAN clusters from vSAN 6.7 U3 to vSAN 7.0 U1. Currently, each 2-node vSAN cluster is using a dedicated vSAN witness host appliance. As a result of the upgrade, the administrator would like to leverage the vSAN shared witness feature to reduce the resources being consumed.

In preparation for the first vSAN cluster upgrade, the administrator has completed the following tasks:

1. Upgraded vCenter Server to vCenter Server 7.0 U1.

2. vSphere High Availability (HA) has been disabled on the vSAN Cluster.

3. Upgraded the vSAN witness host appliance to vSphere 7.0 U1.

4. Upgraded both vSAN data nodes to vSphere 7.0 U1.

The key requirement is to ensure that backwards compatibility to the existing version of vSAN is maintained during the upgrade process.

Which three additional steps should the administrator complete to ensure that subsequent clusters can share the same vSAN Witness? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ceola
2 months ago
I'd say D and E are the way to go. Leverage the existing witness host and also deploy a new one for redundancy. Can't be too careful with this kind of upgrade, you know.
upvoted 0 times
Anna
26 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
2 months ago
We also need to configure the existing witness host appliance to act as a shared witness, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 months ago
I agree with that. It's one of the steps to ensure compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
2 months ago
Haha, I'll go for option E just to be different. Deploying a brand new witness host appliance, because why not spice things up a bit?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Upgrading the ODF to version 12 seems like the logical first step to me. Gotta make sure the underlying infrastructure is up-to-date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
2 months ago
Definitely option D. Configuring the existing witness host appliance to act as a shared witness is the way to go. Keeps things simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
28 days ago
Absolutely, leveraging the vSAN shared witness feature will help reduce resource consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 months ago
That's true, it's important to maintain backwards compatibility during the upgrade process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
1 months ago
I agree, using the existing witness host appliance as a shared witness is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
2 months ago
Option D is definitely the best choice. It will make things simpler and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivan
3 months ago
I think we should upgrade the vSAN On-Disk Format to version 12.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77