Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 5V0-21.21 Topic 5 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 5
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

An organization has two vSAN clusters managed by the same vCenter server, each providing 100 TB of storage. The first cluster runs at 75% of its storage capacity, and the second cluster runs at 40% of its storage capacity.

The company also has the following:

* an iSCSI array of 300 TB, which runs at 76% of its capacity

* a NAS system of 200 TB, which runs at 10% of its capacity

* a Fiber channel (FC) array of 300 TB, which runs at 80% of its capacity

The administrator is asked to add an additional 25 TB of storage to the first cluster but is also made aware that there is no budget to purchase new hardware and that the vSAN Storage Policy Based Management must be kept in place.

Which storage option will work for this use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gayla
6 months ago
That's a valid point, but the storage policy needs to be considered too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
6 months ago
I believe using the FC array would be the best option because it has the highest capacity available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
6 months ago
That's true, but the iSCSI array has more capacity utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
6 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to use the NAS since it has more available capacity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
7 months ago
I think we should use the iSCSI array for additional capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
8 months ago
Ah, good point. In that case, I think the HCI Mesh option might be the way to go. It can integrate with the existing vSAN clusters without breaking the policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
8 months ago
Hold on, what about the requirement to keep the vSAN Storage Policy Based Management in place? That might rule out the NAS option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards using the NAS system to get that additional 25 TB of storage. It's only using 10% of its capacity, so that seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
8 months ago
What about the other storage arrays? The iSCSI array is at 76%, the NAS is at 10%, and the FC array is at 80%. Those might be worth looking into as well.
upvoted 0 times
Reuben
6 months ago
Using the NAS system seems like a good idea since it has plenty of free capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
6 months ago
What about the NAS system? It's only at 10% capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
7 months ago
But the iSCSI array is already at 76%, maybe we should consider other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
7 months ago
We should check the iSCSI array first since it has the most available capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lizette
8 months ago
Okay, let's think through this step-by-step. The first cluster is at 75% capacity, so we have some room there. The second cluster is at 40%, so that's another potential option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
8 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I'm curious to see how we can approach this storage challenge without additional budget.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77