Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 5V0-22.23 Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-22.23 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All 5V0-22.23 Questions]

During yesterday's business hours, a cache drive failed on one of the vSAN OSA nodes. The administrator reached out to the manufacturer and received a replacement drive the following day. When the drive failed, vSAN started a resync to ensure the health of the data, and all objects are showing a healthy and compliant state. The vSAN administrator needs to replace the failed cache drive.

Which set of steps should the vSAN administrator take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lucina
2 months ago
I believe option D is more efficient because it automatically allocates the storage and then rebalances the cache layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
2 months ago
Why do you think option D is better, Lucina?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
3 months ago
I disagree, I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
3 months ago
Hey, at least it's not a complete disaster like that time the admin spilled their coffee all over the server rack. That's what I call a real 'cache'-22 situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
3 months ago
Hmm, I'd be tempted to go with D, but that 'rebalance the cache layer' bit has me a little worried. Better play it safe with B and let vSAN do its thing.
upvoted 0 times
Derrick
2 months ago
Definitely. Letting vSAN handle the rebuild process is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 months ago
I would go with B as well. It's always better to play it safe in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's better to let vSAN do its thing to avoid any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
2 months ago
I think B is the safest option. Let vSAN handle the rebuild.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherron
3 months ago
I agree with Erinn, option B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
3 months ago
Definitely B. Gotta make sure that data is safe before touching anything physical. Plus, it's always nice when vSAN can handle the disk group rebuild automatically.
upvoted 0 times
Dylan
3 months ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
3 months ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erinn
3 months ago
I think the vSAN administrator should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
3 months ago
Ah, the classic vSAN cache drive failure scenario. I'd go with option B - that way, the data migration ensures the health of the objects before swapping out the drive.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
3 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
3 months ago
I agree, it's always best to prioritize data health. Option B is the safest choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
3 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. Full Data Migration ensures everything is healthy before replacing the drive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77