VMware Exam 5V0-23.20 Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-23.20 exam

Question #: 54
Topic #: 1

A company needs its administrators to be able to manage access, apply security policies, and inspect Kubernetes clusters for security and configuration risks across multiple platforms.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

AKubernetes Security Contexts

BKubernetes Role Based Access Control (RBAC)

CTanzu Kubernetes Grid Service

DTanzu Mission Control

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Carman at Sep 15, 2024, 01:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-23.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Hector

2 months ago

I bet the answer is D. Tanzu Mission Control. It's got the 'mission control' in the name, so it must be the right choice for managing multiple Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

Brande

20 days ago

C: I've heard good things about Tanzu Mission Control too. It definitely seems like the right choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharmaine

24 days ago

B: Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most comprehensive solution for overseeing Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

1 months ago

A: I think you're right, D. Tanzu Mission Control sounds like the best option for managing access and security policies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe B? Kubernetes RBAC seems a bit more straightforward than the other options.

upvoted 0 times

Paris

25 days ago

User 3: Definitely B. RBAC is the way to go for managing security policies and access in Kubernetes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willow

26 days ago

User 2: I agree. RBAC provides a granular level of control over who can access what in the cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

1 months ago

I think B is the right choice. RBAC is essential for managing access in Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Almeta

2 months ago

Well, this is a tough one. I'm gonna go with C. Tanzu Kubernetes Grid Service, just because it sounds like it might have the required features.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 months ago

D. Tanzu Mission Control looks like the way to go. It's specifically designed for managing security and configuration across Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

2 months ago

I think the answer is B. Kubernetes RBAC seems like the most comprehensive solution to manage access and security across multiple platforms.

upvoted 0 times

Chandra

29 days ago

D: Tanzu Kubernetes Grid Service is more focused on deploying and managing Kubernetes clusters, rather than security and access control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashon

1 months ago

C: Tanzu Mission Control also provides centralized management and security policies for Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vannessa

2 months ago

B: I agree, RBAC allows for fine-grained control over access to resources within Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

2 months ago

A: I think the answer is B. Kubernetes RBAC seems like the most comprehensive solution to manage access and security across multiple platforms.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but Tanzu Mission Control could also be a good option as it provides centralized management and monitoring of Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

3 months ago

I agree with Evan, RBAC allows for fine-grained control over access to resources in Kubernetes clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evan

3 months ago

I think Kubernetes Role Based Access Control (RBAC) would be the best solution for this.

upvoted 0 times

...