VMware Exam 5V0-23.20 Topic 9 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-23.20 exam

Question #: 48
Topic #: 9

[All 5V0-23.20 Questions]

A Namespace contains multiple Tanzu Kubernetes clusters.

How is access granted to a single Tanzu Kubernetes cluster?

ACreate a custom Role and RoleBinding, and then apply to the Namespace using kubectl commands.

BUse the vSphere Client to grant access to the Namespace.

CCreate a custom Role and RoleBinding, and then apply to the Tanzu Kubernetes cluster using kubectl commands.

DUse the vSphere Client to grant access to the Tanzu Kubernetes cluster.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Gladys at Jul 08, 2024, 04:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-23.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Herminia

5 months ago

I see your point, but using kubectl commands gives more control and flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauryn

5 months ago

Haha, D is just trying to confuse us. As if the vSphere Client would be the way to grant access to a specific Tanzu Kubernetes cluster. Nice try, question writer!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamar

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between A and C. Both involve creating a custom Role and RoleBinding, but the application step is different. I'll have to think this one through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

Magda

3 months ago

I'm leaning towards C. Applying the custom Role and RoleBinding directly to the Tanzu Kubernetes cluster using kubectl commands makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

3 months ago

I agree, A seems like the right choice. It's all about applying it to the Namespace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denna

3 months ago

I think A is the correct answer. You apply the custom Role and RoleBinding to the Namespace using kubectl commands.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamesha

4 months ago

Yeah, A makes sense. It's about granting access to the Namespace with the custom Role and RoleBinding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

4 months ago

I agree, A seems to be the right choice. It's all about applying it to the Namespace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marg

4 months ago

I think A is the correct option. You apply the custom Role and RoleBinding to the Namespace using kubectl commands.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

5 months ago

But wouldn't it be easier to just use the vSphere Client?

upvoted 0 times

...

Melina

5 months ago

I agree with Herminia, creating custom Role and RoleBinding makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

5 months ago

I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeffrey

5 months ago

D is a trap! You can't use the vSphere Client to grant access to a single Tanzu Kubernetes cluster. That's just silly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karima

5 months ago

I think the answer is C. It makes the most sense to apply the custom Role and RoleBinding to the specific Tanzu Kubernetes cluster, not the Namespace.

upvoted 0 times