Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 5V0-93.22 Topic 5 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-93.22 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 5
[All 5V0-93.22 Questions]

An administrator notices that a sensor's local AV signatures are out-of-date.

What effect does this have on newly discovered files?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Devorah
2 months ago
Haha, this one's a real head-scratcher! I'm gonna go with C, though. I mean, if the AV is out-of-date, the sensor's gonna play it safe and just block everything, right? Better safe than sorry, I say!
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
B, for sure. The sensor will be all like, 'Hey, buddy, I don't know what this file is, so you decide if you want to let it in or not. I'm just the middleman here.'
upvoted 0 times
Noel
2 months ago
D) The sensor is unable to block a malicious file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's good to have that extra layer of security with user input.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 months ago
B) The sensor prompts the end user to allow or deny the file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 months ago
A) The reputation is determined by cloud reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marleen
3 months ago
Yes, that seems like the most logical answer based on the situation described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to say B. If the AV is out-of-date, the sensor will probably prompt the user to make the call, since it can't trust its own judgment. Gotta love giving the end user that much power, eh?
upvoted 0 times
Myrtie
2 months ago
D) The sensor is unable to block a malicious file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's better to let the end user decide than risk blocking something important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
B) The sensor prompts the end user to allow or deny the file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
2 months ago
A) The reputation is determined by cloud reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaquana
3 months ago
So, does that mean the answer is D) The sensor is unable to block a malicious file?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
3 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with D here. An out-of-date AV means the sensor can't do its job, so it won't be able to block a malicious file. Might as well just throw the whole sensor out the window!
upvoted 0 times
Kris
3 months ago
A) The reputation is determined by cloud reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
3 months ago
D) The sensor is unable to block a malicious file.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heike
3 months ago
That's true, the sensor needs up-to-date signatures to effectively detect and block threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
3 months ago
Clearly, the correct answer is C. If the AV signatures are out-of-date, the sensor won't be able to properly identify new threats, so it will automatically block the file to be on the safe side. Anything else would be like driving blindfolded!
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
2 months ago
C) The sensor automatically blocks the new file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
2 months ago
A) The reputation is determined by cloud reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
3 months ago
C) The sensor automatically blocks the new file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
3 months ago
A) The reputation is determined by cloud reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marleen
3 months ago
I think if the sensor's AV signatures are out-of-date, it might not be able to block a malicious file.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77