VMware Exam 5V0-93.22 Topic 7 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-93.22 exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 7

An administrator has configured a terminate rule to prevent an application from running. The administrator wants to confirm that the new rule would have prevented a previous execution that had been observed.

Which feature should the administrator leverage for this purpose?

ASetup a notification based on a policy action, and then select Terminate.

BUtilize the Test rule link from within the rule.

CConfigure the rule to terminate the process.

DConfigure the rule to deny operation of the process.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Kanisha at Apr 08, 2024, 07:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-93.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Gracia

6 months ago

Yes, that makes sense too. It's all about ensuring the security measures are effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

7 months ago

I think configuring the rule to deny operation of the process could also be effective in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roosevelt

7 months ago

That's true, it's important to confirm that the new rule would have prevented the previous execution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

7 months ago

I believe setting up a notification based on a policy action and selecting Terminate would also be a good option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

7 months ago

I agree with testing the rule would give a clear indication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roosevelt

7 months ago

I think the administrator should utilize the Test rule link from within the rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

8 months ago

Ah, but what if the administrator wants to set up a notification based on the policy action? Then option A might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

8 months ago

Come on, guys, let's not overthink this. The answer is clearly option B - the Test rule feature. It's the only one that lets you confirm the rule without actually applying it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

8 months ago

Yeah, but then you'd actually be terminating the process, which the question says the administrator doesn't want to do. The Test rule feature is the safest and most appropriate option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgie

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think configuring the rule to terminate the process (option C) might be a simpler and more direct way to achieve the same result.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

8 months ago

I agree, the Test rule feature is the way to go here. It allows you to simulate the rule without actually applying it, which is perfect for this use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

8 months ago

This is a great question that really tests our understanding of rule configuration. I think the best approach would be to use the Test rule feature (option B) to confirm that the terminate rule would have prevented the previous execution.

upvoted 0 times

Glory

7 months ago

Agreed, that would be the most effective way to confirm the new rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

7 months ago

I think we should go with option B and utilize the Test rule feature.

upvoted 0 times

...