Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 5V0-93.22 Topic 9 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-93.22 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 9
[All 5V0-93.22 Questions]

An administrator wants to prevent ransomware that has not been seen before, without blocking other processes.

Which rule should be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carolynn
2 months ago
Hmm, this one's a toughie. I think I'll have to go with C - better safe than sorry when it comes to unknown malware. Time to send that process packing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I'm gonna go with B, just to be on the safe side. Ransomware is no joke, so let's terminate that sucker!
upvoted 0 times
Sue
6 days ago
User 4: Yeah, let's not take any chances with ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
7 days ago
User 3: Better safe than sorry, let's go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
8 days ago
User 2: Agreed, let's terminate any ransomware-like behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
23 days ago
User 1: I think B is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
2 months ago
I'm feeling option A on this one. Deny the operation if it's scraping memory from another process. Sounds like some sneaky adware or PUP to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
Hmm, D looks good to me. If it's not a listed app and it's running, might as well terminate it. No need to let something suspicious stick around, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
I'd go with C. Terminate the process if it's unknown malware that's running. Gotta nip that in the bud before it causes any damage.
upvoted 0 times
Tamra
19 days ago
Dierdre: Better safe than sorry when it comes to dealing with unknown threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
20 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that's the best way to prevent any potential damage from happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 months ago
I agree, we should definitely terminate the process if it's unknown malware.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
2 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Terminate the process if it's not a known app and exhibits ransomware-like behavior. Better safe than sorry!
upvoted 0 times
Aleshia
2 months ago
Definitely, it's important to have measures in place to stop ransomware before it can cause damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
2 months ago
Better to be safe than sorry when it comes to protecting against unknown threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
2 months ago
Yeah, terminating the process if it's not a known app is a good way to prevent ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
2 months ago
I agree, option B sounds like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincenza
3 months ago
But wouldn't terminating the process be too drastic? I still think A) is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) [Not listed application] [Performs ransomware-like behavior] [Terminate process]
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) [Adware or PUP] [Scrapes memory of another process] [Deny operation]
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77