Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

WELL AP Exam WELL-AP Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for WELL AP's WELL Accredited Professional (WELL AP) Exam exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2
[All WELL Accredited Professional (WELL AP) Exam Questions]

A WELL Cote building project wishes to challenge the findings of a WELL report. Which of the following steps should the protect team take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

If a project team disagrees with the findings of a WELL report, the appropriate course of action is to submit an appeal. This process allows the project team to challenge specific decisions or interpretations made during the assessment of their project against WELL Building Standard requirements. The appeal process is designed to ensure fairness and accuracy in the certification process, providing a mechanism for project teams to seek a review of decisions they believe to be incorrect or not reflective of their project's compliance with WELL criteria.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Merissa
2 months ago
D for sure, gotta submit that curative action plan. Might as well fix the problems and get it done right the first time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
2 months ago
Hey, if it's good enough for WELL, it's good enough for me! Why challenge the findings at all? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
2 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Might as well just start fresh with a recertification, get it done right the second time around.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
1 months ago
Agreed, a recertification will ensure everything is up to standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 months ago
Agreed, it's better to get it done right the second time around.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
1 months ago
It's important to make sure everything is done correctly the second time around.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
1 months ago
Yeah, starting fresh with a recertification seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
1 months ago
Yeah, starting fresh with a recertification seems like the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 months ago
I think submitting for recertification is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
I think submitting for recertification is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 months ago
Recertification seems like the most logical step to take in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
I agree, it's best to start fresh and make sure everything is done correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
2 months ago
I think submitting for recertification is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Flo
3 months ago
B is the way to go, submit for equivalency. Ain't nobody got time for a full recertification process.
upvoted 0 times
Benton
2 months ago
I agree, it's definitely the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 months ago
B) Submit for equivalency
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clement
3 months ago
I think submitting a curative action plan might be necessary depending on the specific findings of the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
3 months ago
I believe submitting for equivalency could also be a valid option to challenge the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
3 months ago
I agree with Fannie, submitting an appeal seems like the right step to challenge the findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
3 months ago
I'd go with D, a curative action plan sounds like the best option to address the issues. Might as well fix it properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
3 months ago
A for sure, appealing the findings is the way to go. Who does this WELL report think they are?
upvoted 0 times
Crissy
2 months ago
D) Submit a curative action plan
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
2 months ago
I agree, appealing the findings is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
2 months ago
A) Submit an appeal
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
3 months ago
I think the protect team should submit an appeal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77