Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

WELL AP Exam WELL-AP Topic 7 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for WELL AP's WELL Accredited Professional (WELL AP) Exam exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 7
[All WELL Accredited Professional (WELL AP) Exam Questions]

The project's property management team is discussing ways to keep indoor volatile organic compound (VOC) levels as low as possible after building occupancy. Which of the following strategies is most effective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To maintain low levels of indoor volatile organic compounds (VOCs), it is most effective to use air purification devices that include both an activated carbon filter, which adsorbs gases and odors, and a high-efficiency MERV 14 filter, which can capture airborne particles including those that may carry VOCs. This combination is effective in reducing the concentration of VOCs in the indoor environment, promoting better indoor air quality and supporting the health and well-being of the occupants in alignment with the WELL Building Standard's principles.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Pamela
18 days ago
I agree with Mammie, option C seems like the best choice for reducing VOC levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
21 days ago
But air purification devices can help remove VOCs efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
25 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 months ago
I think option C is the most effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
2 months ago
I personally think option A could also help in maintaining low VOC levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
2 months ago
C is the way to go, folks. Gotta love that activated carbon - it's like nature's very own Pac-Man, gobbling up those pesky VOCs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
2 months ago
Hey, why not just install a giant hamster wheel to power the whole building? That'll keep the VOCs at bay, and provide some much-needed exercise for the occupants!
upvoted 0 times
Ben
1 months ago
D) Ultraviolet lamps to irradiate the surfaces of the cooling coils and drain pans
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
1 months ago
A) Humidifiers in each regularly occupied space
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherita
2 months ago
I think option B could also be effective in reducing VOC levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
2 months ago
B is the obvious choice. MERV 16 filters are the Cadillac of air filtration, man. Outdoor air is where it's at!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old battle against VOCs. I reckon D is the answer here - those UV lamps will zap those pesky compounds right off the cooling coils!
upvoted 0 times
Gertude
28 days ago
Selma: True, that could also be effective. Maybe a combination of both would work best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
29 days ago
But what about air purification devices with activated carbon filters?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, UV lamps sound like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
2 months ago
I think C is the way to go. Air purification with activated carbon and MERV 14 filters will really do the trick in keeping those VOCs at bay.
upvoted 0 times
My
28 days ago
Good point, it's all about finding the right balance between surface and air purification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
1 months ago
True, but C can continuously filter out VOCs in the air, providing long-term protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 months ago
But wouldn't D be more effective in killing off any remaining VOCs on surfaces?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 months ago
I agree, C seems like a solid choice to tackle those VOCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Afton
2 months ago
I think option C is the most effective.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77